Automated CAPTCHA solving is going through a revolution. Where anti-CAPTCHA services used to rely on real people solving images for a reward, this year an ever-growing share of CAPTCHAs is already being solved by neural networks. AI has advanced a lot: there are cases where a model solves Google reCAPTCHA v2 correctly 100 times out of 100. This calls into question the old belief that humans are always better than machines at solving CAPTCHAs. As a result, modern services increasingly offer hybrid approaches (AI tries to solve instantly, and humans handle the hard cases) or even fully automated AI-based solutions - and the share of these solutions keeps growing. At the same time, for scraping specialists, QA engineers, and developers, CAPTCHAs remain a major barrier. Today, integrating anti-CAPTCHA services is common practice: these tools are built into many parsers, anti-detect browsers, and account management platforms. For example, 2Captcha is supported by most bots and parsers, and popular anti-detect browsers (Multilogin, Dolphin Anty, etc.) work directly with 2Captcha, CapMonster, and others. In this article, we’ll look at six leading CAPTCHA bypass services in 2026 - their architecture, solving speed and accuracy, supported CAPTCHA types, pricing, and integration specifics. 2Captcha - the crowdsourcing veteran 2Captcha is one of the oldest and best-known anti-CAPTCHA services, operating for over 10 years. Architecture: predominantly manual solving (crowdsourcing). 2Captcha distributes CAPTCHAs across a huge pool of human workers worldwide, who type answers for a small reward. Algorithms (OCR) are sometimes used for the simplest cases, but the core is still humans. This approach guarantees a solution for virtually any CAPTCHA. Supported CAPTCHAs: 2Captcha is known for extremely broad format coverage. It can solve almost everything: from classic text CAPTCHAs and all versions of Google reCAPTCHA (v2, v3, Invisible) to niche regional CAPTCHAs (Yandex, VK, etc.), image rotation puzzles, click-on-object challenges, GeeTest puzzles, and so on. It’s easier to list what it does not support - basically only brand-new or very exotic systems, and even those are usually added quickly. With a large human workforce, any new CAPTCHA can be solved manually even if there is no algorithm for it yet. Accuracy: the human factor provides very high accuracy. For simple CAPTCHAs, the correct answer on the first attempt is achieved in ~99% of cases. If a worker makes a mistake, you can resubmit the CAPTCHA or dispute the incorrect answer - 2Captcha will refund the credit for an error. Overall, the error rate is low, and crowdsourcing makes it possible to solve even ambiguous CAPTCHAs that can confuse AI. Speed: solving time depends on the CAPTCHA type and service load. Simple CAPTCHAs are solved by 2Captcha on average in 7-15 seconds, because thousands of workers online pick up tasks almost instantly. Under good conditions, you may get an answer in 5 seconds. Complex CAPTCHAs take longer: Google reCAPTCHA v2 is usually ~20 seconds (in CaptchaTheCat tests, ~20-22 s). In ideal cases - if the worker is already logged into Google - a reCAPTCHA token can be issued in 1-3 s, but in the worst case it can take up to 60 s. On average, ~20 s is a вполне acceptable result. For reCAPTCHA v3, which requires “warming up” a browser, the time can reach 20-30 s. FunCaptcha (Arkose 3D puzzles) is one of the slowest: around 1 minute; for 2Captcha it’s ~55 s. Still, all CAPTCHAs are solved within a minute, and 2Captcha continuously optimizes speed (for example, using authenticated workers, parallelizing verification steps, etc.). Cost: 2Captcha has effectively set the market price baseline. Pricing is dynamic: it depends on task complexity and the number of available workers. Regular image CAPTCHAs cost roughly $0.5 per 1000 solves. Google reCAPTCHA is more expensive: from ~$1 to $3 per 1000 (average price ~ $2), and around $1 per 1000 for complex types (GeeTest, FunCaptcha, etc.). So even at peak demand, the price does not exceed a few dollars per thousand. For incorrectly solved CAPTCHAs, 2Captcha refunds money (there is an error report/dispute system). Integration: the simplicity of the 2Captcha API has become legendary. Two HTTP requests are enough: submit a task, then after some time fetch the result by ID. The protocol format is very simple (URL parameters), and thanks to 2Captcha’s popularity it has become an industry standard. Many competitors (SolveCaptcha, CapMonster, etc.) implemented compatible endpoints so clients can switch without rewriting code. 2Captcha provides official libraries for popular languages (Python, PHP, JS, Java, C#, etc.) and many integration examples. The entry threshold is minimal - beginners often start with 2Captcha. There are also official browser plugins (Chrome, Firefox, etc.) that automatically solve CAPTCHAs on pages and insert the answer - convenient for those who don’t write code but want to make browsing or manual scraping easier. Key points: 2Captcha is a universal workhorse, proven over time. It supports an enormous range of CAPTCHA types and has one of the largest user communities. This means thousands of people are ready to solve your CAPTCHA at any moment, and it’s easy to find tips and ready-made modules for 2Captcha online. In practice, the 2Captcha API has become the de facto standard for anti-CAPTCHA integrations. On the downside, speed can drop during peak hours, and there is no fixed time SLA (everything depends on the live queue). Also, at very large simultaneous volumes (hundreds of requests), small delays are possible, although the service does not impose formal limits on parallelism. Overall, if you need reliability and broad CAPTCHA coverage, 2Captcha remains one of the best choices in 2026. SolveCaptcha - a next-generation hybrid service SolveCaptcha is a relatively new player with an ambitious hybrid technology. The service positions itself as a “powerful and fast” universal solver for virtually all CAPTCHA types. Architecture: hybrid AI + human. Simple tasks (for example, distorted text, uncomplicated images) are recognized by a neural network in seconds (typically 2-5 s). If a CAPTCHA is complex or multi-step, it is immediately routed to a human operator. This approach improves speed without sacrificing reliability: the service automatically solves ~95-99% of CAPTCHAs, involving a human where the algorithm is not confident. Supported CAPTCHAs: SolveCaptcha supports almost all popular CAPTCHA types. Their list includes Google reCAPTCHA (v2, Invisible, v3, including Enterprise), Arkose Labs FunCaptcha, Cloudflare Turnstile, GeeTest, regular image CAPTCHAs with text, sliders, math challenges, and so on. By coverage, SolveCaptcha aims to cover ~95% of scenarios, which is close to “full” market coverage. Solving accuracy: around 95-99% successful solves. Simple text is read almost without errors using OCR; only when an image is completely unreadable does a human get involved. Complex CAPTCHAs (for example, Arkose puzzles) are solved by humans, which delivers a high first-try correctness rate. Solving speed: thanks to AI, SolveCaptcha is very fast on simple tasks (3-5 seconds for text CAPTCHAs instead of ~10 seconds for a human). ReCAPTCHA v2 is solved on average in ~4.5 s, and reCAPTCHA v3 in ~26 s. Under ideal conditions (warmed-up browsers on the workers’ side), a reCAPTCHA token can be issued in as little as 2 s. FunCaptcha (Arkose) is a harder case: it takes ~48 s because an operator completes the puzzle manually. Overall, for typical CAPTCHAs SolveCaptcha aims to stay within seconds or tens of seconds - within a minute even for the hardest tasks. Cost: thanks to automation, SolveCaptcha undercuts prices. A typical rate is < $1 per 1000 solves for common CAPTCHAs: 1000 reCAPTCHA v2 solves cost about ~$0.55, reCAPTCHA v3 about ~$0.8. Simple text image CAPTCHAs are even cheaper (~$0.50 per 1000, like competitors). The hardest ones - Arkose FunCaptcha - go up to $2.99 per 1000, which is noticeably lower than purely manual platforms during peak hours. Integration: the API is fully compatible with 2Captcha - the same methods (in.php, res.php), response format, and so on. This means you can switch from 2Captcha to SolveCaptcha in minutes. Official SDKs are also available in 8 languages, with detailed documentation and examples (including scripts for Selenium/Puppeteer). There is a browser extension (Chrome/Chromium) for automatic CAPTCHA solving on pages. Additional useful features are implemented: a webhook for callback responses (so you don’t have to poll for results) and an API method to complain about an incorrectly solved CAPTCHA to receive a credit refund. Key points: SolveCaptcha is a “fresh” service that successfully combines industry best practices. It offers maximum speed thanks to AI, is very developer-friendly, and for now maintains low prices. SolveCaptcha’s reliability is directly tied to its infrastructure. Anti-Captcha (AntiGate) - a scalable professional service Anti-Captcha is another market veteran. It can be called a direct competitor to 2Captcha: in terms of approach, it also relies on humans solving CAPTCHAs rather than neural networks. Over the years, Anti-Captcha has refined its infrastructure for high loads and is known for stability. Architecture: human crowdsourcing, without in-house AI. That said, Anti-Captcha does introduce external automation - for example, it offers reCAPTCHA v3 solving via emulated browsers, which speeds up the process. Overall, this is an “old-school” service oriented toward enterprise tasks. Supported CAPTCHAs: Anti-Captcha supports all common types. The full list includes Google reCAPTCHA v2/v3 (including Invisible and Enterprise), complex puzzles like GeeTest and Arkose FunCaptcha, Cloudflare Turnstile, classic text-in-image CAPTCHAs, click CAPTCHAs, sliders, and so on. Like 2Captcha, Anti-Captcha tries to adapt quickly to new CAPTCHA types. Accuracy: because it relies on real people, the solving accuracy is high, close to 99% for all task types. Unlike 2Captcha, Anti-Captcha does not provide refunds for incorrectly solved CAPTCHAs. Speed: under normal load, speed is comparable to 2Captcha: simple images in ~5-10 seconds, reCAPTCHA v2 usually 10-20 s. The service actively optimizes reCAPTCHA solving: it uses Google-authenticated workers and browser emulation to reduce token acquisition time. Often the token arrives in ~10 seconds. ReCAPTCHA v3 is also solved fairly quickly (a few десятков seconds). The heaviest CAPTCHAs (FunCaptcha, etc.) take up to a minute, as with competitors. Cost: Anti-Captcha pricing is close to 2Captcha. Regular text CAPTCHAs are ~$0.50 per 1000. ReCAPTCHA v2 is around $1 per 1000; complex types like FunCaptcha or GeeTest are up to ~$2 per 1000. Pricing is dynamic; there is “floating” pricing depending on time of day and load (i.e., when workers are scarce, the rate increases within разумные limits). Integration: Anti-Captcha provides its own JSON API (JSON-RPC format). Instead of two URL requests like 2Captcha, you use createTask / getTaskResult methods and structured JSON fields. On plain HTTP it’s slightly more complex (you need to build JSON and handle fields). In a single request you can specify task parameters: CAPTCHA type, the required proxy/IP for solving (for geo-dependent CAPTCHAs), browser emulation settings, etc. There are SDKs for all major languages, integration modules for Selenium and Puppeteer, and even Telegram bots for quick access. Browser extensions (Chrome, Firefox, Safari) and plugins for popular automation tools are also available. In short, integration is fine, it just requires a bit more attention to request structure. Key points: Anti-Captcha is aimed at professional use and large projects. It fits well when you need high volumes 24/7, enterprise-level CAPTCHAs, or fine-grained control (proxies, geography, behavior emulation). Downsides include less user-friendly support and dynamic price surcharges during peak hours. DeathByCaptcha - a hybrid with audio CAPTCHA support DeathByCaptcha (DBC) is an international service with more than 15 years of history. DBC was among the pioneers of the hybrid approach: combining OCR algorithms with a 24/7 team of human decoders. DeathByCaptcha continues this approach today, although its popularity is somewhat lower than 2Captcha. Architecture: hybrid AI + humans. The service tries to solve simple CAPTCHAs automatically (OCR) in a fraction of a second, and if the algorithm is not confident, it hands the task to a human for manual input. This offloads operators and speeds up responses for trivial tasks. Supported CAPTCHAs: historically, DBC specialized in simple image CAPTCHAs, but over time it significantly expanded the list. Today it supports nearly all major types, including: regular text CAPTCHAs (images with letters/digits), Google reCAPTCHA v2/v3 (including Invisible), Arkose Labs FunCaptcha, GeeTest (v3/v4 puzzles), and a number of specific systems (KeyCaptcha, Lemin, Capy, AWS WAF CAPTCHA, FriendlyCaptcha, etc.). Overall, DeathByCaptcha’s coverage is slightly narrower than the giants, but it covers all popular and even many rare options. Accuracy: thanks to the hybrid scheme, DBC delivers >90% first-try accuracy on simple CAPTCHAs and up to 99% with additional human verification. Put simply, OCR solves most simple tasks correctly, and if it fails, a human will almost certainly provide the right answer. On complex CAPTCHAs, accuracy is comparable to other human-powered services. Plus, DBC guarantees a credit refund for each incorrectly solved CAPTCHA upon a client claim. Speed: on simple CAPTCHAs, DBC benefits from OCR - many images are recognized in ~9 seconds on average. If the algorithm fails, extra time is added to hand off to a human, but this happens in parallel (so it does not heavily slow down the flow of simple tasks). For complex CAPTCHAs that require a human (reCAPTCHA, etc.), speed is generally standard: ~15-30 seconds for reCAPTCHA v2, i.e., at the level of 2Captcha/AntiCaptcha. During peak hours, however, DBC can be slightly slower than competitors - average reCAPTCHA solve time can be higher (up to ~26 s). FunCaptcha and similar heavy tasks are also solved in tens of seconds (up to a minute). It’s important to note that DBC has a smaller worker pool than 2Captcha, so under heavy load delays are possible. The service even applies price surcharges during peak hours (~10-20%) to regulate load. This indirectly suggests that without surcharges speed would drop during peak time. Still, for moderate volumes DBC provides acceptable solving speed for all CAPTCHA types (typically within 30 seconds). Cost: DeathByCaptcha’s pricing model differs from competitors. Instead of strict per-1000 pricing, DBC sells packages of solved CAPTCHAs - for example, 5000 CAPTCHAs for a fixed amount. Converted, it comes to roughly $1-3 per 1000 CAPTCHAs depending on the type. Simple CAPTCHAs are about ~$0.99 per 1000, complex ones (reCAPTCHA, GeeTest) are a few dollars per 1000. DBC uses dynamic pricing: during peak periods, the price automatically increases by 10-20%. This helps motivate workers, but for clients it means a small price increase if you submit tasks exactly at peak load. Integration: from the start, DeathByCaptcha aimed to be compatible with familiar tooling. Their API is very similar to the 2Captcha and Anti-Captcha APIs, and an official compatibility mode is supported - DBC can accept requests in the Anti-Captcha API format. That is, existing Anti-Captcha code can be adjusted minimally (swap the URL and key) and it will work with DeathByCaptcha. The same applies to the 2Captcha format. This is done so clients can keep DBC as a backup: if the primary service fails, you can quickly switch traffic to DBC without rewriting logic. Official SDKs exist for Python, Java, C#, PHP, and others. Key points: today, DeathByCaptcha is somewhat smaller in scale than the leaders, but it remains reliable and flexible. It is convenient as a backup channel or in combination with other APIs. Overall, DBC is a time-tested hybrid service with good accuracy. Its downsides are a slightly higher price for complex tasks and possible delays under heavy load. CapMonster Cloud - an AI-only cloud CAPTCHA solver CapMonster Cloud represents a new generation of services that rely on fully automated CAPTCHA solving using AI. The project is created by Zennolab based on their CapMonster software and is available as a cloud API. Unlike crowdsourcing platforms, CapMonster Cloud does not involve humans at all: all tasks are handled by neural networks and emulated browsers. Architecture: pure AI in the cloud. This brings a huge advantage in speed and cost, but imposes limitations for the hardest CAPTCHA types. Supported CAPTCHAs: CapMonster Cloud covers the most common CAPTCHA types: Google reCAPTCHA v2/v3 (including Enterprise), Cloudflare Turnstile, GeeTest puzzles (sliders, v3/v4 puzzles), Cloudflare CAPTCHAs, some CAPTCHAs from gaming platforms and payment gateways, and various simple image CAPTCHAs (text, math, object selection). The hardest interactive CAPTCHAs like Arkose Labs FunCaptcha are not supported. Pure AI solutions still struggle with them. Accuracy: claimed accuracy reaches 99%. In practice, AI handles uniform, template-like CAPTCHAs well, especially simple image CAPTCHAs (where the model has been trained on thousands of examples) - there quality is close to 99-100%. For more complex types (for example, reCAPTCHA tokens), accuracy is also high, although errors cannot be fully ruled out. Speed: here CapMonster Cloud is in a league of its own. The model typically solves a CAPTCHA in under 1 second - instant by human-service standards. Average time is <1 s per CAPTCHA. For complex CAPTCHAs that require browser emulation (for example, reCAPTCHA v2/v3), a few seconds may be added to run scripts - but it is still usually measured in single-digit seconds, up to ~10 s. CapMonster Cloud can process over 1000 CAPTCHAs per minute by scaling compute under load. Even with high-volume solving, per-CAPTCHA time stays stable because there is no worker queue (algorithms scale horizontally). Cost: without the “human factor,” CapMonster Cloud pricing is multiple times lower than human-powered services. Simple CAPTCHAs cost from $0.02-0.05 per 1000 solves - effectively negligible compared to $1/1000 with humans. Complex CAPTCHAs (like reCAPTCHA) are priced in the $0.7-2.6 per 1000 range. With this kind of undercutting, the cost per solved CAPTCHA drops by an order of magnitude. Economically, CapMonster Cloud is one of the cheapest options, especially for large volumes of uniform tasks. Integration: the service supports API emulation for popular platforms. You can send requests in the 2Captcha or Anti-Captcha format - it’s enough to change the endpoint to capmonster.cloud and use a CapMonster API key. Other parameters (sitekey, URL, image) remain the same. CapMonster “pretends” to be 2Captcha by accepting familiar commands and returning results in a similar format. This lowers the migration barrier: many scripts can be switched to CapMonster almost instantly. Of course, there is also a native API with additional settings (for example, you can explicitly select modules or fine-tune the algorithm for your case). Key points: CapMonster Cloud is a clear example of the full-automation trend. Its main advantages are phenomenal speed and extremely low CAPTCHA solving costs. Where algorithms work (and that is the vast majority of CAPTCHAs), CapMonster beats humans both in time and unit cost. It is ideal for large streams of similar CAPTCHAs where throughput and speed matter. But the downsides follow from AI’s nature: if you hit a non-standard or heavily protected CAPTCHA (for example, Arkose FunCaptcha with a 3D game), a pure algorithm will not solve it. CapMonster simply does not include it in its capabilities. In such cases, you have to switch to hybrid services. Buster - a free AI extension for reCAPTCHA Buster: Captcha Solver for Humans is an unusual entry in our list. It’s a browser extension, not a cloud service. Buster is completely free and open-source, and it solves CAPTCHAs locally, without third-party APIs. Buster’s approach is narrow: it helps you pass Google reCAPTCHA v2 (the “I’m not a robot” checkbox with image challenges) by switching to the audio challenge and using speech recognition. The extension appeared several years ago and quickly gained popularity among users tired of manually clicking traffic lights and storefronts. Architecture: Buster does not involve remote humans, but it also does not contain its own neural networks - it uses a third-party speech recognition service via built-in browser capabilities. In other words, Buster automates an alternative way of passing reCAPTCHA: instead of solving the visual puzzle, it switches to the audio CAPTCHA and converts the audio into an answer using speech-to-text. Everything happens locally in the browser, on a single button click. Thus, Buster is a fully automated (no human involvement) approach, but applicable only to one CAPTCHA type. Supported CAPTCHAs: only Google reCAPTCHA v2 (including Invisible reCAPTCHA, where you can manually open the audio tab). Buster is tailored to Google’s CAPTCHA, because it offers an audio option for visually impaired users. Other CAPTCHAs either have no audio mode, or audio is more complex/unavailable there, so Buster does not support them. Buster also does not solve arbitrary text-in-image CAPTCHAs, sliders, puzzle CAPTCHAs, etc. This is a deliberate limitation. But reCAPTCHA is extremely common - and for that one, Buster saves a lot of time. Accuracy: the extension does not guarantee 100% success, but it works quite effectively. Google sometimes generates difficult audio with noise or background words - speech-to-text may misrecognize it. About 3 out of 4 Buster attempts succeed on the first try, and on the second try it almost always works. If recognition fails, the user can request a new audio challenge and run Buster again - usually the next attempt succeeds. So overall reCAPTCHA solving accuracy with Buster is very high (close to 99% after 1-2 iterations). Of course, Google evolves: under suspicious activity it may temporarily disable audio CAPTCHA or serve deliberately difficult files. Buster itself warns against abuse: if you solve dozens of CAPTCHAs in a row, Google will eventually get suspicious and force you back to image challenges. But for moderate use, Buster’s accuracy and reliability are quite good. Speed: a full reCAPTCHA solving cycle via Buster usually takes 10-30 seconds, often 10-20 s. This includes clicking the button, downloading the MP3, recognition, and submitting the answer. Buster is significantly faster than manually clicking images (where one CAPTCHA can take 30-60 s or more). However, it is slightly slower than paid services like 2Captcha (which typically return a ready token in ~10 s on average). Still, Buster works directly in the browser and does not require network API calls, except to the speech recognition service. In real scenarios, most CAPTCHAs are solved in ~15 seconds on the first attempt, which is вполне acceptable. Cost: Buster is completely free. It is an open-source extension with code on GitHub. It is available for Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Opera - in total it has hundreds of thousands of users (in Chrome alone, >600k installs). No API keys or subscriptions are needed: install and use. The extension does not monetize users; it only uses a public speech recognition API (Google) that is available anonymously and for free within the required volumes. For privacy-minded users, there is an option to configure a local speech engine or an offline engine so you don’t send data to the network at all. In terms of costs, Buster wins across the board: zero rubles per CAPTCHA, aside from the user’s time to click the button. Integration: since Buster is a browser extension, it is designed more for manual or semi-automated use. After installation, it adds its own button to the reCAPTCHA widget (a small colored puzzle icon next to the checkbox). The user needs to notice the CAPTCHA and click this button - then Buster does the rest automatically. Integrating Buster into fully unattended scripts is harder: for example, in Selenium tests you can theoretically emulate clicking the extension button, but it’s not out of the box and is unreliable. Therefore, Buster is positioned as a tool for interactive browsing: when you personally use the browser and don’t want to waste time on CAPTCHAs. From a technical standpoint, integration is simple: install the extension, and it detects CAPTCHAs on the page and shows its icon. No API key or configuration is required. Key points: Buster’s advantages are obvious - free, open, privacy-friendly. It is extremely easy to use and genuinely reduces the раздражение factor around reCAPTCHA. But there are limitations: only reCAPTCHA v2, and even then in a semi-automatic mode (it needs your click). It won’t work for large-scale automation or CI/CD scripts - API services are better there. Also, Google can limit audio challenges under suspicious activity, so Buster is not a универсальный solution for bots. Summary comparison table Below are the key characteristics of the reviewed services: Service Architecture Accuracy Average solving time CAPTCHA support Cost (per 1000) SolveCaptcha Hybrid (AI + humans) 95-99% (AI + human verification) 3-5 s (text); ~4-5 s reCAPTCHA v2; up to 25-50 s for complex reCAPTCHA v2/v3, FunCaptcha, Turnstile, GeeTest, image + text ~$0.5 per 1000 simple; ~$0.8 per 1000 reCAPTCHA v3; up to $2.99 per 1000 FunCaptcha 2Captcha Manual (crowd) ~99% (human, refunds for errors) 7-15 s (simple); ~20 s reCAPTCHA v2 (average); up to 60 s worst case reCAPTCHA v2/v3, FunCaptcha, GeeTest, any image/text ~$0.5 per 1000 simple; ~$1-3 per 1000 reCAPTCHA; dynamic by load Anti-Captcha Manual (crowd) ~99% (human, no refunds) ~5-10 s (simple); 10-20 s reCAPTCHA v2; ~1 min FunCaptcha reCAPTCHA v2/v3, FunCaptcha, GeeTest, Turnstile, image/text ~$0.5 per 1000 simple; ~$1 per 1000 reCAPTCHA; up to ~$2 per 1000 complex CAPTCHAs DeathByCaptcha Hybrid (OCR + humans) >90% immediately; up to 99% with verification ~9 s (simple, OCR); 15-30 s reCAPTCHA v2; ~50 s FunCaptcha reCAPTCHA v2/v3, FunCaptcha, GeeTest, image/text ~$1-3 per 1000 (in packages); e.g., ~$2.9 per 1000 reCAPTCHA; discounts/surcharges by situation CapMonster Cloud Fully AI ~99% (you don’t pay for failures) <1 s (simple); ~1-5 s reCAPTCHA (browser emulation); (does not solve FunCaptcha) reCAPTCHA v2/v3, Turnstile, GeeTest, image/text (without FunCaptcha) ~2-4 RUB (≈$0.03) per 1000 simple; 50-194 RUB ($0.7-2.6) per 1000 reCAPTCHA; very cheap Buster (extension) Local AI (speech-to-text) ~75% first try; ~99% on 2nd 10-20 s per reCAPTCHA v2 (audio); retry manually if needed Only reCAPTCHA v2 (audio CAPTCHA) free (open-source extension) Conclusion In 2026, the anti-CAPTCHA market offers solutions for every taste: from classic crowd-powered platforms to high-accuracy neural networks. Hybrid services (like SolveCaptcha, DeathByCaptcha) try to combine the best of both worlds: AI speed on trivial tasks and human universality on hard ones. Fully automated AI services (CapMonster Cloud and similar) win on speed and price, but may not cover extreme edge cases such as 3D CAPTCHAs. Still, the gap is shrinking: neural networks already solve 95% of CAPTCHAs no worse than humans, and weaknesses in systems like reCAPTCHA suggest that the future belongs to AI. When choosing a solution, it’s important to consider your project’s needs. If you have massive volumes of uniform CAPTCHAs and milliseconds matter, look toward AI. If CAPTCHAs are non-standard and constantly changing, the old-school crowd (2Captcha, Anti-Captcha) with near-100% coverage is more reliable. Hybrids offer a middle ground, often saving seconds and money without sacrificing quality. For personal use and small tasks, don’t forget free tools like Buster - they can cover your needs without spending a single ruble.  

In-depth review of MobileProxy.Space focusing on real scenarios for SMM, scraping, QA, ad verification, and SEO. Step-by-step instructions, metrics, hacks, common mistakes, and comparisons with alternatives will help you quickly implement the service and achieve predictable results.   Introduction: What Problem Does MobileProxy.Space Solve? Digital platforms are tightening anti-fraud measures and complicating automation. Businesses need to gather data, manage advertising, test local versions, and securely work with multiple accounts. However, data center IPs quickly encounter limitations, while residential proxies lose stability. Mobile networks operate differently. Requests from mobile network subscribers statistically generate more trust, Captcha triggers less frequently, and bans occur slower with proper settings. This allows legal tasks to be carried out faster and more reliably. MobileProxy.Space addresses this pain point with a scalable pool of 4G 5G mobile IPs featuring managed rotation, session fixation, and flexible geo-segmentation. We obtain real mobile reputation and control typically available only to large in-house teams. In this article, we analyze practical use cases, offer step-by-step instructions, metrics, and highlight mistakes to avoid. Service Overview: Key Features and Benefits of MobileProxy.Space What It Is. MobileProxy.Space is a mobile proxy service based on real SIM cards and carrier ASNs. It offers protocols like HTTP, HTTPS, and SOCKS5, manual and automatic IP rotation, sticky sessions, country and sometimes city selection, as well as filtering by operator when coverage is available. Management is accessible via a dashboard and API, making it perfect for team collaboration and scaling. Key Features 4G 5G Mobile IPs. True mobile reputation and high trust on popular platforms when used correctly. IP Rotation. Automatic at intervals or manual through the dashboard, useful for scraping and load distribution. Sticky Sessions. Fixing IPs for sessions or until forced rotation, critical for authorization and sequential scenarios. Geo and Operator. Choose the country, sometimes the region and carrier. Convenient for local marketing and ad verification. Protocols HTTP, HTTPS, SOCKS5. Compatible with browsers, proxy clients, Selenium, Puppeteer, curl, and integration systems. API. Programmatic management of ports, rotation, connection parameters, and logs. Integration into CI CD and RPA pipelines. Limits and Pools. Flexible port allocation for teams and projects, isolation, metrics on traffic and stability. Security. Access through username and password, optional IP whitelists for panels and API, and role-based access control. Business Advantages Reduced Blockages. Supported by mobile reputation and smart rotation, resulting in lower Captcha density and frequency of temporary restrictions. Faster Launch Speed. Ready pools and a clear API expedite pilots and experiments. Scalability. Projects can be easily scaled by ports and geo without losing quality control. Transparency. Logs, metrics, and predictable behavior lead to repeatable results. Key Technical Parameters to Note Rotation Intervals. Use intervals from 2 to 30 minutes for scraping. For authorized sessions, use sticky until the scenario completes. Protocol Type. HTTP, HTTPS is suitable for most web access tasks, while SOCKS5 is useful for complex applications and protocol transparency. Sessions. Fixation based on username session tags. Example: user-session-abc. This makes IP delivery repeatable until a manual change occurs. Geo. Choosing a country and operator increases local relevance and measurement accuracy. API Idempotency. Use an idempotency key for rotation scripts to prevent duplicates. Use Case 1: SMM and Managing Multiple Accounts While Minimizing Risks For Whom. SMM agencies, advertising teams, influencer and affiliate networks, brand support teams. Purpose. To distribute risks between projects, reduce Captcha and sudden checks, ensure stable authorizations, and maintain a content plan without drops. How to Use Create a separate port pool for each brand or segment in the dashboard. Name the pools based on projects. For working accounts, enable sticky sessions, set the rotation interval manually rather than using a timer. Bind ports to specific browser devices. For example, one port — one profile in an anti-detect browser. Restrict access to the panels via IP whitelists and employee roles. Select the desired country and preferred mobile carrier in the settings if available. Step-by-Step Example Create a Project A pool of 5 ports. Choose the country where the target audience is located. Enable sticky for each port. Add a session suffix to the username, like session-acc1, session-acc2, etc. In the anti-detect browser, create 5 profiles. In the proxy settings, specify host:port, the username with session tag, and password. Schedule publications. Log in only from the fixed profile and port. Perform manual rotation every 7-14 days or after the campaign is completed. Track metrics: the share of successful publications, frequency of additional checks, moderation time. Code Example for Connection Example for curl in one line: curl -x http://user-session-acc1:password@proxy_host:proxy_port https://target.site Case Results An agency with 12 brand accounts transitioned 8 of them to MobileProxy.Space and divided them by ports. Over 30 days, the percentage of additional checks dropped from 11% to 4%, and the average time to prepare a publication decreased from 16 to 9 minutes. The share of successful media uploads rose by 7 points thanks to stable sessions. Life Hacks Use one port per account and avoid switching between profiles. Manual rotation is safer for authorized scenarios. Perform it after completing working blocks. Keep connection logs by project to analyze incidents. Common Mistakes Changing IP during two-factor authentication. Always fix the session. Combining test and production accounts on one port. Separate pools are mandatory. High action frequency. Moderate activities according to platform policies. Use Case 2: Scraping and Price Monitoring in Mobile Search Results For Whom. E-commerce, aggregators, competitive intelligence departments, BI teams. Purpose. To obtain up-to-date information on prices, availability, and promotions from the perspective of mobile users, which often differs from desktop. How to Use Prepare a list of target pages and endpoints. Ensure compliance with robots.txt and website terms. Set up a pool of ports with auto-rotation every 5-10 minutes. Choose 2-3 countries for A/B testing. Implement a client using Python requests or Node with support for retries and timeouts. Add triple backoff for 429 and 5xx errors and save response bodies for validation. Aggregate data into a showcase, calculating the median price and interquartile range to monitor anomalies. Python Code Example One line for a basic request: requests.get('https://target.site/api', proxies={'http':'http://user-session-rot1:password@proxy_host:proxy_port','https':'http://user-session-rot1:password@proxy_host:proxy_port'}, timeout=20) Pilot Case An electronics retailer collected 180,000 product cards in a week from mobile results across 3 countries. Changing IP every 7 minutes allowed maintaining a share of responses without Captcha at 92%. The accuracy of price recognition, verified against stocks, was 97.4%, and the SLA for sampling was 95% of operations completed within 8 seconds. Based on the data, prices were adjusted for 310 SKUs, resulting in a 4.6% increase in category margin over the month. Life Hacks Use sticky only within the request chain to one store, then rotate the IP. Parallel streams by countries and operators increase network diversity. Regularly update User-Agent for mobile browsers and keep a pool of 20-40 strings. Common Errors Aggressive frequencies and absence of backoffs lead to blocking. Using the same IP for multiple domains. Cluster them. Ignoring legal limitations. Always check the terms of data use. Use Case 3: Ad Verification and Anti-Fraud: Controlling Creatives and Targeting For Whom. Advertisers, agencies, brand teams, marketing security departments. Purpose. To verify which creatives are actually shown to mobile users by geo, operator, and segments. To catch discrepancies between media plans and reality. Algorithm Formulate a verification plan: geo, grids, time slots, platforms. Set up pools for each country. If the platform ties to a carrier, create separate pools for operators. Use a headless browser with mobile device emulation. Fix the session during verification and perform manual rotation after a series of accesses. Collect screenshots, DOM, and network requests, hash creatives for deduplication. Compile reports and compare with the media plan: frequencies, compliance of creatives, rates of non-targeted impressions. Mini-Configuration for Puppeteer Launch in one line: puppeteer.launch({ args:['--proxy-server=http://proxy_host:proxy_port'] }) and authorize via page.authenticate with username user-session-adv1 and password. Case A brand campaign in 2 countries. The team set up two pools with different operators. In 72 hours, 3,600 checks were conducted. The share of correct creatives was 96.1%, with 2.3% of impressions found to be non-targeted. Changing the partner platform reduced empty impressions to 0.8% and saved 11.5% of the budget during the period. Life Hacks Group checks in batches of 10-15 accesses to one platform before rotation. Capture network HAR files and compare CDN hosts of creatives to identify replacements. Keep track of redirect chains to monitor intermediaries. Common Errors Random auto-rotation during debugging. For ad verification, manual changes are preferable after a series of checks. Using a single session for different geos. Segment infrastructure by country. Use Case 4: QA and Geo-Testing of Mobile Applications and Pages For Whom. QA teams, product managers, localization, DevOps. Purpose. To check availability, correctness of redirects, local prices, languages, currencies, and the ability to install and authorize in mobile environments. Instructions Compile a matrix of checks: countries, languages, currencies, crucial screens, and scenarios. Create pools for each country. Define two modes: sticky for authorization and auto-rotation for smoke tests. Set up a mobile device or emulator. For web, use a browser with a mobile UA; for applications, use a system proxy via SOCKS5. Build a pipeline in CI CD. At nightly intervals, run smoke tests through MobileProxy.Space. Collect metrics: scenario success rates, load times, defects, and their geography. Example for Connecting an Android Emulator In system settings, set SOCKS5 proxy host proxy_host and port proxy_port, then authenticate in the proxy-client application with user-session-qa1. Case A fintech application tested onboarding for 4 countries. Mobile proxies were used to check SMS flows, local conditions, and exchanges. Discrepancies in currency on one screen and incorrect placeholders in 3G conditions were identified. Corrections were made in one sprint, reducing complaints from these countries by 37%. Life Hacks For stable authorization, keep sticky until the end of the scenario, then rotate manually. Emulate different network speeds to catch defects in lazy loads. Keep network logs close to the test report to quickly replicate incidents. Common Errors Parallel test runs on one port. Separate ports by streams. Forgetting rotation after script completion. Reused IPs can distort results of subsequent tests. Use Case 5: SEO Tasks: Local SERP, Snippets, and Visibility For Whom. SEO specialists, content teams, local marketing teams. Purpose. To collect mobile SERP for keywords, track snippets, AMP, and vertical blocks, and analyze competitor snippets in specific regions. Steps Collect semantics and distribute them across countries and cities if there’s city-level detail. Set up pools with manual rotation and limit requests per minute to search engines according to recommendations and common sense. Use a headless browser or a clean HTTP client with mobile User-Agents. Capture HTML and screenshots of key queries for visual verification. Count positions, types of blocks, and enriched snippet elements. Mini-Code in Node One-time request: fetch with proxy settings or a library supporting HTTP proxies, proxy string http://user-session-serp1:password@proxy_host:proxy_port Case A local delivery service checked 480 keywords across 3 cities. Working through MobileProxy.Space stabilized mobile SERP collection with a share of valid responses at 89-93%, reducing Captcha incidents by 41%. The team identified 26 missing micro-markups and added FAQ blocks to 17 pages, improving organic CTR by 1.8 points over 3 weeks. Life Hacks Segment queries by intent types and run them in different windows to avoid overloading one session. Use control queries to compare mobile and desktop results. Keep a history of SERP to track the emergence and disappearance of verticals. Common Errors Too aggressive scraping. Reduce density and respect resources. Mixing geos. Different cities should have separate sticky sessions. Use Case 6: Marketing Intelligence in Social Media and Marketplaces For Whom. Category managers, brand teams, research departments, affiliate networks. Purpose. To observe assortments and prices, collect reviews, and track product card dynamics while acting delicately and adhering to platform rules. How to Set Up Allocate pools by platforms. One pool — one marketplace or social network. For viewed pages, use sticky for a short period. After completing the chain, switch to a new IP. Collect only permitted data. Check terms, do not bypass technical barriers, and do not use prohibited actions. Store only aggregated metrics and anonymized identifiers if required by policies. Implement load control and parallel processing by countries. Result Example The Clothing category team, after 10 days of monitoring in 2 countries, found that competitors' discount campaigns activate on Fridays after 2 PM local time. By adjusting its timing, it managed to increase the share of promo displays by 12% and category turnover by 6.2% in the next cycle. Life Hacks Collect NPS and reviews in a targeted manner without mass spikes, spreading requests over time. Check the mobile version separately, as filters and sortings may differ. Common Errors Using one port across different platforms. Separate to avoid correlating activity. Storing personal data without justification. Comply with regulatory requirements and platform rules. Use Case 7: Secure Access for Distributed Teams and RPA Bots For Whom. Information security services, DevOps, automation teams, call centers working with web interfaces. Purpose. To ensure predictable network output divided by project, reduce triggers of anti-fraud systems on legitimate automation, and standardize configurations. Setup Create pools for teams. Allocate 2-3 ports per project for each team. Enable IP whitelists for access to the dashboard and API, and enable two-factor authentication if available. Give RPA bots sticky for the scenario, while internal users get auto-rotation with a 10-minute interval. Implement a central proxy manager. Store credentials in a secret manager. Write logs and measure SLO: share of successful operations, average response time, and frequency of Captcha. Case The support service conducts post-moderation of partner cards via web. They transitioned 40 operators and 6 RPA scripts to MobileProxy.Space. The level of unexpected logouts dropped by 54%, while the proportion of operations completed on the first attempt rose to 92%. The system monitors reputation degradation by ports and automatically executes manual rotation as per regulations. Life Hacks Use different session identifiers for people and bots to differentiate them in logs. Enable alerts for SLA when the Captcha share rises by 30% compared to the average. Common Errors Storing username and password in code. Use a secret manager. Mixing production and test environments on one port. Comparison with Alternatives: Why MobileProxy.Space is Often Superior Against Data Center Proxies Reputation. Mobile IPs generate more trust, whereas data centers are often on blocklists. Availability. Less Captcha when adhering to frequencies, especially in social networks and e-commerce. Stability for Complex Scenarios. Sticky sessions work more predictably. Against Classic Residential Proxies Quality of the Pool. Mobile networks provide a high entropy background, reducing the correlation of actions. Managed Rotation. Flexible IP switching and session fixation are better designed for mobile networks. Operator Segmentation. The ability to select an operator is helpful for ad verification and QA. When an Alternative is Appropriate Data centers are suitable for mass internal tasks without anti-fraud measures and where minimal cost per stream is crucial. Residential solutions may be cheaper for long-background sessions without risks of blockages. The choice of tool depends on the goal. But if you have legitimate user scenarios typically performed by mobile clients, MobileProxy.Space offers the best compromise between stability, speed, and cost-effectiveness. FAQ: Frequently Asked Practical Questions Can I fix the same IP for several hours? Yes, use sticky sessions. However, keep in mind that excessively long sessions increase the risk of accumulating behavioral patterns. It’s recommended to fix the IP for the scenario and perform manual rotation upon completion. How can I reduce Captcha occurrences while scraping? Maintain intervals, use backoffs, update mobile User-Agents, distribute streams among countries and operators. Do not overload a single domain. Use sticky only within a short chain. Do proxies work with Selenium and Puppeteer? Yes. Set the system proxy or command-line argument and use page.authenticate for proxy login. The session is set in the username as a session tag. Can I choose a specific operator? In some geos, selecting the operator is available. This is useful for ad verification and local tests. If the operator is not available, use the country level and several ports. What protocols are supported? HTTP, HTTPS, and SOCKS5. HTTP, HTTPS is suitable for most scenarios, while SOCKS5 is helpful for applications and specific traffic. How can I automate rotation? Via the dashboard or API. You call the method to change the IP for a specific port or set an auto-rotation interval. For critical operations, manually fix the session and change the IP upon completion. How to protect access to ports? Use strong passwords, roles, IP whitelists, and secret managers. Separate pools by projects and individuals. Log operations and conduct audits regularly. Can I combine mobile and data center proxies? Yes, this is a good pattern. Directly collect low-risk data from data centers while performing sensitive actions through MobileProxy.Space. A hybrid approach reduces costs without compromising quality. How to measure effectiveness? Track the share of successful operations, response times, frequency of Captcha, share of first-time authorizations, and business metrics such as CTR, conversions, product availability, etc. Is the service suitable for large teams? Yes. Port pools, role separation, and API allow projects to scale while ensuring transparency and management. Conclusion: Who Will Benefit and How to Get Started MobileProxy.Space is ideal for SMM teams, e-commerce analysts, SEO and QA specialists, ad verifiers, and RPA engineers working with mobile user scenarios who seek stability, predictability, and control. Its suite of features—mobile 4G 5G IPs, rotation, sticky sessions, geo-segmentation, API, and team pools—addresses most practical tasks of 2026 without unnecessary complexities. How to Get Started Quickly Define your goals. Measurable metrics and desired SLAs. Create pools for projects. Delineate access and roles. Select geo and rotation intervals. Use sticky for authorized scenarios. Integrate proxies into your tools. Browser, scripts, CI CD, RPA. Run a pilot for 1-2 weeks. Measure the share of successful operations, Captcha frequency, and speed. Scale up. Add ports, countries, and teams, documenting best practices. By following these steps, you will achieve predictable results: fewer blockages and failures, faster operational speed, and better data quality. This means quicker hypotheses, more confident decisions, and more sustainable growth.  

In the realm of digital tools, we often face a fundamental choice: Should we opt for an all-in-one platform that integrates numerous features and appears to be a “do-it-all” solution, or choose a specialized tool focused purely on a single domain with deep expertise? The former promises to solve all problems with one comprehensive suite, while the latter is dedicated to perfecting the solution to one core challenge. Today, this choice is vividly reflected in the comparison between ixBrowser and MoreLogin—it is not merely about the number of features, but also about the essence of efficiency, the allocation of resources, and the protection of core values. When we shift our focus from advertised feature lists to real-world business operations, we discover that true efficiency often stems from “focus.” The broader the scope a tool attempts to cover, the more its energy, resources, and innovative capacity become diluted. For the majority of teams whose operations rely on securely and stably managing web-based accounts, choosing the specialist that concentrates all its “firepower” on one key area typically translates to lower cognitive load, more manageable risks, and a clearer long-term development path. Therefore, this article aims to delve deeply into the two distinct product philosophies and technical approaches represented by ixBrowser and MoreLogin. Moving beyond superficial feature comparisons, we will explore dimensions such as architectural design, resource focus, long-term technological investment, and ultimate user value. Through this analysis, we will demonstrate why, when facing the complex challenges of web-based anti-detection, an intensely focused specialized tool is often a wiser and more efficient strategic choice than a feature-integrated composite platform. What is MoreLogin？ MoreLogin is a unique account management tool that innovatively combines an antidetect browser with a Cloud Phone service within a unified workspace, designed to provide users with a secure and efficient platform for multi-account operations. Its core “Dual-Engine Architecture” allows users to create both isolated, persistent browser profiles and cloud-based virtual phones running a full Android OS, seamlessly covering account separation and management needs for both web and mobile scenarios. The platform places a strong emphasis on security and automation. Security-wise, it offers an optional “Zero-Knowledge Encrypted Sync” where users hold the encryption keys, preventing the service from accessing browser data. For efficiency, it integrates no-code RPA automation, smart synchronization, and API tools to help users transform repetitive tasks into automated workflows. It is suited for various industries requiring secure multi-account operations, such as digital marketing, e-commerce, and social media management. Advantages of MoreLogin Innovative Dual-Engine Architecture for Multi-Scenario Coverage MoreLogin’s core strength lies in its unique “dual-engine” design, offering both isolated browser environments and cloud-based full Android phones (Cloud Phone). This addresses anti-detection needs on the web and also allows for native, secure operation of mobile apps (e.g., TikTok, social apps), providing a truly integrated solution for users managing both web and mobile accounts. Strong Security Architecture Centered on “Zero-Knowledge Encryption” Security-wise, it offers an optional Zero-Knowledge Encrypted Sync. User browser data is end-to-end encrypted in the cloud, and the encryption keys are generated and held by the users themselves, preventing the service provider from accessing the data. This design gives complete control over data privacy to the user, which is highly distinctive among similar tools. Integrated Automation & No-Code RPA Tools The platform has built-in automation features, including a visual, no-code RPA editor, and can integrate with popular tools like Zapier and Make. This allows users to turn repetitive click operations into automated templates or workflows, significantly improving the consistency and efficiency of multi-account operations while reducing manual labor. Disadvantages of MoreLogin Complex Architecture May Lead to Higher Learning and Usage Costs While powerful, the deep integration of both browser and cloud phone features increases system complexity. For users who only need basic web anti-detection, the cloud phone functionality may seem redundant, and the overall interface operation logic and learning curve could be higher than that of a single-purpose anti-detect browser. Extremely Strict Limitations on the Free Plan The free plan only offers 2 permanently free browser profiles and limited Cloud Phone trial minutes. For users needing to manage multiple accounts simultaneously or wanting to fully test Cloud Phone and automation features, the free version is almost impractical, quickly steering users toward paid plans. As an Integrated Innovative Solution, Long-term Stability Awaits Broad Validation Although the website shows a large user base, its model of deeply integrating two resource-intensive services (antidetect browser and cloud phone) is still cutting-edge in the industry. The performance of such a complex architecture under massive user concurrency, long-term operational stability, and against continuously evolving detection mechanisms across platforms still requires longer time and broader market validation. What is ixBrowser? ixBrowser is a comprehensive anti-detect browser specifically designed for managing multiple online accounts securely and efficiently. It enables users to create isolated browser environments, each with a unique and consistent digital fingerprint. This technology is crucial for professionals in digital marketing, e-commerce, and social media management to operate multiple accounts without triggering security flags or bans from platforms. The platform stands out with its user-friendly interface, making sophisticated fingerprint spoofing accessible even to less technical users. Beyond core profile management, ixBrowser supports advanced features like team collaboration with detailed permission controls, seamless proxy integration, and automation through browser automation studios. It provides a robust solution for tasks ranging from affiliate marketing and ad verification to large-scale data scraping. Why is ixBrowser the best alternative to MoreLogin？ In the selection of anti-detect tools, the trade-off between “functional integration” and “solution focus” has become a key issue. MoreLogin, with its innovative “Browser + Cloud Phone” dual-engine model, offers a highly integrated solution for specific scenarios. However, this “all-in-one” design also implies greater complexity, potential resource redundancy, and the bundling of specific features. For users whose core needs are squarely centered on secure multi-account operations on the web, a more focused, pure, and deeply optimized professional browser is often a more efficient and economical choice. ixBrowser is an outstanding representative of this philosophy. Focus on Core Scenarios, Resulting in Lower Cost & Better Price While MoreLogin’s dual-engine architecture is powerful, its cost necessarily includes the resource overhead of the Cloud Phone service. For users who don’t need virtual mobile devices and focus solely on web operations, this portion of the cost is redundant. ixBrowser focuses exclusively on web anti-detection, channeling all resources and R&D into optimizing browser fingerprints and stability. Therefore, when delivering equal or even superior web experience, it typically demonstrates more significant price advantages and higher cost-effectiveness, as users don’t pay for unused features. Pure Architecture, Lighter Experience & Faster Onboarding By integrating Cloud Phone, MoreLogin’s operation interface and concepts are relatively complex, with a steeper learning curve. As a single-function browser, ixBrowser’s interface design, operation logic, and configuration processes are more intuitive and streamlined. Users (especially beginners) can get started faster and focus on core account management tasks without spending extra effort understanding or configuring mobile environments irrelevant to their needs. Mature Technical Path with Lower Long-Term Risk & Uncertainty Deeply integrating a browser with a cloud phone is a cutting-edge and complex engineering feat. Its long-term, large-scale stability, efficiency in resource scheduling between the two services, and bidirectional compatibility against platform detection face more severe challenges and uncertainties. ixBrowser’s technical path is more classical and focused. Its architecture, fingerprint update mechanisms, and performance optimizations have undergone longer market validation, providing users with more predictable and stable long-term assurance. More Direct and Efficient Problem Identification & Support Response When issues arise in MoreLogin’s complex environment (e.g., account abnormalities), troubleshooting must cover both browser fingerprints and the cloud phone environment, increasing the complexity of technical support. With ixBrowser, due to its single environment and clear architecture, both users and support teams can more quickly pinpoint problems at the web browser fingerprint or proxy level, making troubleshooting and resolution more direct and efficient, thereby minimizing impact on business continuity. Conclusion In summary, MoreLogin is an innovative tool designed for demanding scenarios that require both web and mobile capabilities. However, the strength of ixBrowser lies in its profound focus: by streamlining its scope, it offers a superior solution in terms of cost, usability, stability, openness, and support efficiency for a much larger user base that only needs to tackle web-based anti-detection challenges. For users whose operations are fundamentally web-based and who pursue ultimate efficiency and controllability, choosing a specialized expert like ixBrowser is a far wiser decision than opting for a feature-bloated all-in-one toolkit.  

In the selection of business tools, we often face a critical crossroads: to remain in the comfort zone of what is “adequate” and “easy to use,” or to proactively embrace a more extensible and forward-looking system for future possibilities. This choice becomes particularly evident when comparing Lalicat, which focuses on providing a convenient localized experience, with ixBrowser, which is dedicated to building global compatibility. The former is like a familiar, well-arranged room where everything is within reach; the latter resembles a structure built with unlimited interfaces for future expansion, whose value grows increasingly apparent as the business scales. For many users starting in their home market, initial tool choices are often driven by immediate, concrete needs, such as language affinity and payment convenience. However, when a successful business inevitably expands into broader markets, facing more complex platform rules and fiercer competition, a tool's “adaptive capacity” replaces “convenience” as the new core criterion. At this point, the focus of evaluation shifts from “what can it do for me now” to “can it support me where I want to go.” Therefore, this article will delve into the fundamental differences between ixBrowser and Lalicat in terms of product philosophy, technical architecture, and ecosystem vision. This comparison aims to demonstrate that for teams aspiring to transcend regional limits and pursue sustainable international growth, choosing ixBrowser is not a simple lateral switch but a strategic upgrade for the future—a key decision to ensure that the business infrastructure can evolve in step with its own ambitions. What is Lalicat？ Lalicat Browser is a professional anti-detect browser designed for users who need to securely manage multiple online accounts. It creates isolated browser environments, each configured with a unique IP address, browser fingerprint (such as Canvas, fonts, User-Agent), cookies, and cache. This effectively prevents different accounts from being detected and linked by platforms due to identical digital fingerprints, thereby avoiding the risk of mass bans. The browser emphasizes practical functionality and team collaboration, offering batch operations, team permission management, and automated task support. Its interface is intuitive, supports one-click data import from mainstream browsers, and seamlessly integrates with various proxy services. Whether for cross-border e-commerce multi-store operations, social media matrix management, or advertising and market research, Lalicat is committed to providing an efficient and stable solution for multi-account operations. Advantages of Lalicat High Localization & Convenient Payment Support As a browser primarily targeting Chinese users, Lalicat offers a fully Chinese interface, localized customer support, and payment methods familiar to domestic users like Alipay and WeChat Pay. This significantly lowers the barrier to entry and communication costs for Chinese users, especially cross-border e-commerce sellers, allowing them to get support faster when issues arise. Prominent Cost-Effectiveness & Flexible Plans Lalicat typically offers core anti-detection features at competitive prices. Its subscription plans are often flexible and diversified for users of different scales (from individuals to teams), making it a low-cost entry option for budget-conscious users or those new to multi-account management. Focus on Practicality & Batch Operation Efficiency The product design emphasizes practicality, offering convenient batch creation, import, launch, and management of browser profiles. It also supports integration with mainstream proxy IP services and includes basic team collaboration permission management, aiming to improve daily operational efficiency when handling a large number of accounts. Disadvantages of Lalicat Limited International Influence & Ecosystem Compatibility Its main market and community are concentrated in the Chinese-speaking region, with low international recognition. Consequently, the adaptation speed and depth of its browser fingerprint database against the latest anti-fraud algorithms of global mainstream platforms (e.g., Google, Facebook), as well as its integration capabilities with other international SaaS tools or automation frameworks, may lag behind global products. Potential Lack of Advanced Features & Technical Depth While it meets the needs of daily multi-account operations, when facing scenarios with extremely high security demands (e.g., high-value advertising accounts, cryptocurrency), the granularity and customizability of its fingerprint simulation, as well as the isolation strength of its underlying environment, may fall short compared to top-tier tools known for technical depth like Kameleo or ixBrowser. Strict Limitations on the Free Version Like many similar products, Lalicat's free version or trial typically imposes very strict limits on the number of creatable browser profiles, available proxy IPs, or team members. This is mainly to guide users towards paid plans, but for those wanting to thoroughly test its performance limits, the free version may offer a relatively limited experience. What is ixBrowser? ixBrowser is a comprehensive anti-detect browser specifically designed for managing multiple online accounts securely and efficiently. It enables users to create isolated browser environments, each with a unique and consistent digital fingerprint. This technology is crucial for professionals in digital marketing, e-commerce, and social media management to operate multiple accounts without triggering security flags or bans from platforms. The platform stands out with its user-friendly interface, making sophisticated fingerprint spoofing accessible even to less technical users. Beyond core profile management, ixBrowser supports advanced features like team collaboration with detailed permission controls, seamless proxy integration, and automation through browser automation studios. It provides a robust solution for tasks ranging from affiliate marketing and ad verification to large-scale data scraping. Why is ixBrowser the best alternative to Lalicat？ For teams seeking to break through regional market limits and expand into global operations, the selection criteria for anti-detect browsers are shifting from "localization-friendly" to "globalization-compatible." Lalicat Browser, with its excellent Chinese support and convenient local payments, has served as a practical entry point for many domestic users into multi-account management. However, as business reaches out to more complex international platforms and demands higher-level team collaboration and long-term technical support, its limitations become apparent. ixBrowser targets this very need for an upgrade, offering an alternative path that is more globally oriented in terms of technical vision, ecosystem integration, and long-term value. Truly Global Compatibility & Platform Adaptability While Lalicat's strengths are concentrated on serving the Chinese ecosystem, ixBrowser is designed from the ground up for the global market. Its browser fingerprint database and anti-detection rules are continuously optimized and rapidly updated for major international platforms like Google, Facebook, Amazon, and TikTok. This ensures higher account security and success rates for users operating internationally, reducing unstable risks caused by regional platform policy differences. More Agile Technical Updates & Countermeasure Capability Anti-detection is a dynamic race against constantly evolving platform algorithms. Lalicat's update rhythm may prioritize stability for domestic e-commerce platforms. In contrast, ixBrowser typically demonstrates faster iteration, responding more promptly to the frequent detection mechanism updates of international platforms. This technical agility is key to ensuring the long-term survival of high-value international accounts and represents the core upgrade from a "usable tool" to a "competitive moat." More Granular and Scalable Team Management System While both offer team features, ixBrowser's team management system often excels in design logic and granularity. It supports clearer role-based permission models and better adapts to the collaborative needs of multinational, distributed teams. For businesses that have evolved from "individual operation" to "team-based, process-driven" operations, this is an essential upgrade for improving management efficiency and security. Transparent Long-Term Cost & Superior Price Advantage While Lalicat's initial price may seem attractive, ixBrowser holds a greater advantage in long-term value. ixBrowser typically offers more transparent plans that include more core features (e.g., more generous profile limits, more comprehensive automation APIs). Its cost-effectiveness becomes increasingly evident as team size and business complexity grow. Choosing ixBrowser means a clearer Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) and fewer hidden subsequent costs, representing a more rational long-term investment. More Professional Technical Support & Problem-Solving Capability While Lalicat offers Chinese customer support for easy communication, its support team's technical depth and solutions may be limited when facing complex ban or detection issues on international platforms like Google or Facebook. ixBrowser serves a global user base, and its technical support team typically handles more diverse and cutting-edge technical issues from international platforms. Therefore, when dealing with advanced problems like complex account appeals or deep fingerprint debugging, it can provide more professional and effective guidance, which is crucial for ensuring the continuity of high-value business operations.  

A step-by-step guide to configuring mobileproxy.space mobile proxies in the ixBrowser anti-detect browser. In 60–90 minutes you’ll learn how to buy and connect a proxy, build profiles, automate IP rotation, and verify the setup works smoothly—without errors. Introduction In this step-by-step guide, you’ll learn how to connect mobile proxies from mobileproxy.space to the ixBrowser anti-detect browser, create and configure proxy-bound profiles, set a realistic browser fingerprint, sync geolocation and time zone, and automate IP rotation. By the end, you’ll have a fully working environment for safe, believable work with sites, accesses, and accounts—plus checklists and fixes for common issues. Who this guide is for: beginners using mobile proxies and an anti-detect browser for the first time, and advanced users who want a structured, optimal setup with automated rotation and verification in 2025. What you should know upfront: basic computer skills (installing apps, copy/pasting text), understanding of login/password, and the ability to read simple UI hints. No prior networking or proxy knowledge required—we’ll keep it simple. Time required: 60–90 minutes for your first setup cycle. After that, creating new profiles and connecting additional proxies will take about 5–10 minutes per profile. Outcome: you’ll have a working ixBrowser profile with a connected mobile proxy, a correct fingerprint, and automated IP rotation as needed—plus a clear process you can repeat for new profiles. Preflight checklist Before you start, make sure you have everything you need and your computer meets the system requirements. This helps avoid errors during installation and first launch. Required tools and access An account on mobileproxy.space with an active mobile proxy plan (choose country, carrier, and duration as needed). ixBrowser anti-detect browser with access to your dashboard (account created and app installed). A payment method to purchase the proxy (bank card or other supported options). An email address for registration and notifications. System requirements Operating system: Windows 10/11 or macOS (current releases, 2025). CPU: at least 2 cores; 4+ cores recommended. RAM: minimum 8 GB; 16 GB recommended for comfortable multi-profile work. Free disk space: 2 GB+ for profile storage and cache. Stable internet connection of 10 Mbps or higher. What to download and install Download the ixBrowser installer from the official website. Install ixBrowser following the setup wizard: choose the folder, accept terms, complete installation. Create an ixBrowser account if you don’t have one, then sign in. Prepare your mobile proxy details: server address (host), port, login and password or IP-whitelist access, plus the URL for IP rotation (if available in your mobileproxy.space dashboard). Backups Even though the first run is quick, your ixBrowser profile accumulates important data: cookies, local storage, fingerprints. It’s smart to plan backups in advance. After you create at least one working profile, export it to a file (e.g., JSON or another format supported by your plan and iXBrowser version). Store the backup in a protected place (for example, an encrypted, password-protected archive). Repeat exports periodically or use built-in cloud sync if it’s included with your license. ⚠️ Warning: Don’t keep proxy logins and passwords in plain text files on your desktop. Use a password manager or encrypted notes. ✅ Quick check: At this point, ixBrowser is installed and launches correctly, you can sign in, and you have your proxy details (host, port, login/password or whitelist) and rotation URL ready. Key concepts Let’s quickly cover the essentials so every setting makes sense. Mobile proxy — a gateway server that goes online via a mobile network (4G/5G). Its IP looks like a mobile device’s IP, which typically reduces blocks compared to data center proxies. IP rotation — changing the external IP address of your proxy. Useful to reset suspicious sessions and avoid captchas or limits. Anti-detect browser — a browser that lets you create separate profiles with unique fingerprints (technical parameters), isolate cookies and local data, and manage network settings including proxies. Browser fingerprint — a set of parameters: User-Agent, WebGL, Canvas, fonts, language, time zone, screen size, WebRTC, and more. Matching these with IP and geo is critical for plausibility. Proxy authentication — access method: login/password or IP-whitelist. With login/password, you enter credentials in iXBrowser. With whitelist, you add your IP in the proxy dashboard. WebRTC — a real-time streaming technology. If misconfigured, it can leak your real IP. In an anti-detect browser, set it to route via proxy or to block leaks. How it works: you run an iXBrowser profile that connects to the internet through a mobile proxy, then to target websites. They see the IP and parameters provided by the proxy and the profile’s fingerprint—not your real system and ISP IP. What matters most: a believable profile is about consistency—IP (country/city), languages, time zone, geolocation, fonts, and performance. The more they align, the less likely a site will suspect automation or circumvention. Conflicts increase checks and blocks. Step 1: Sign up and buy a mobile proxy on mobileproxy.space Goal Purchase a mobile proxy and get the connection parameters (host, port, login/password or whitelist) and the IP rotation link. Step-by-step Register in the mobileproxy.space dashboard. Provide your email and set a strong password. Go to the plans and locations section. Choose the country you need (e.g., Russia, Kazakhstan, Türkiye, EU—match your project’s requirements). Select IP rotation options. You’ll usually have manual rotation via link (API) and auto-rotation by interval. For flexibility, choose a plan with API access. Choose the authentication type. Login/password is often more convenient if your home IP is dynamic. If you have a static IP, whitelist is fine. Pay for the plan. Wait for activation in your dashboard; you’ll see the host, port, and credentials. Save the IP change URL (generate/show rotation link). You’ll need this for automation and manual IP changes. Check the proxy status in your dashboard: “Active”, expiration date, current IP, and available rotations. Key notes Location should match your target sites. If you’re working with a local service in a specific country, pick that region. Rotation: avoid rotating too frequently if services monitor stability closely. Start with manual rotation as needed. Tip: Use one proxy per working “persona”/profile. That keeps cookies and behavior logically tied to one IP pool. Expected result You have the host, port, login/password or whitelist IP, and the IP rotation URL for your mobile proxy. Possible issues and fixes No rotation access: check if the option is included in your plan, or upgrade. Proxy data missing: refresh the dashboard page and verify payment/renewal. Whitelist not working: make sure you added your current external IP, not your local LAN IP. ✅ Quick check: You can copy a “host:port” pair, login and password, plus the IP rotation URL. The dashboard shows the proxy status as “Active”. Step 2: Prepare ixBrowser and set up a base profile Goal Create your first iXBrowser profile, configure essential fingerprint parameters, enable leak protection, and prepare the profile for a mobile proxy. Step-by-step Open ixBrowser and sign in. Go to the Profiles section. Click “Create profile” / “New profile”. Name the profile. Example: “RU-Mobile-01” or “TR-Mobile-BrandA”. Stick to a consistent naming convention. Select the target platform/agent (e.g., Windows/Chrome). For realism, choose a popular combo like Windows + Chrome or macOS + Chrome. Open fingerprint settings: enable fingerprint generation for your chosen platform. If there’s an “Auto” or “Recommended” mode, use it. Open the WebRTC section. Set it to route via proxy or block leaks so sites can’t see your real IP. Set interface language and Accept-Language headers. Match the proxy’s country: e.g., ru-RU for Russia, tr-TR for Türkiye. Set the time zone to “Auto by IP” or choose it manually for the proxy’s country (you can fine-tune after connecting the proxy). Disable unnecessary plugins. Keep standard font and codec sets generated by iXBrowser. Save the profile without launching it. We’re not connecting the proxy yet—this step finishes the fingerprint preparation. Tip: Create folders/labels for profiles by country, brand, or task. It speeds up scaling and prevents confusion. Expected result You’ve created a new profile with a correct base fingerprint configuration, WebRTC protection enabled, and languages set for the intended geo. Possible issues and fixes Profile won’t save: restart ixBrowser, check disk availability, and ensure your antivirus isn’t blocking changes. Confusing parameters: choose the “Recommended” or “Auto” preset; you can adjust later after connecting the proxy IP. ✅ Quick check: The new profile appears in the list with your chosen name, and its properties show WebRTC protection enabled. Step 3: Connect the mobile proxy to your ixBrowser profile Goal Enter the proxy details in the profile and test the connection using ixBrowser’s built-in check. Step-by-step Open settings for the profile you created. Find the “Proxy”/“Network” section (name may vary by version). Select the proxy type. mobileproxy.space usually provides HTTP(S). If SOCKS5 is available, choose it; otherwise, stick with HTTP(S). Paste your proxy host into the “Host/Server” field (e.g., mp123.mobileproxy.space). Enter the “Port” (e.g., 12345). Choose the authentication method: “Login/Password” or “IP (whitelist)”. If using login/password, enter your credentials. Click “Check connection” or similar. Wait for a successful result. Save the profile changes. Launch the profile and open a few pages (e.g., a search engine) to verify browsing works. Don’t log into accounts yet—just test connectivity. Key notes Test without accounts to evaluate speed, stability, and site availability for this IP. WebRTC should already be routed via proxy to avoid leaks. Tip: Store the proxy settings alongside the profile name in your password manager notes. It speeds up support and migration. Expected result The profile connects through the mobile proxy: the iXBrowser connection test passes and pages load without errors. Possible issues and fixes Authentication failed: check login/password, letter case, and remove extra spaces after copy/paste. No connection: temporarily disable VPN/firewall and ensure your antivirus isn’t blocking ixBrowser. Whitelist not applied: your external IP changed—update the whitelist in your mobileproxy.space dashboard. ✅ Quick check: The proxy test shows success, pages load, and a search for ‘what is my ip’ shows an IP different from your ISP IP. Step 4: Sync geo, time zone, and fingerprint with the mobile proxy Goal Align the profile’s key fingerprint parameters with the mobile IP’s geography and language to increase site trust. Step-by-step Determine the IP’s geo: run the profile and search for a tool that shows your IP’s city and country. Note the city/region. Close the browser window and return to the profile settings in ixBrowser. Set “Time zone” to “Auto by IP” or manually select the city’s time zone. Set “System language” and “Accept-Language” to the region’s language (e.g., ru-RU; optionally add en-US second). In “Geolocation”, choose “Use by IP”/“Automatic” or enter coordinates for the real IP city. If there’s an “Emulation” mode, enable city-level accuracy. Check “Fonts” and “Plugins”: keep the standard preset for your platform. Avoid exotic setups if your IP is from a typical region. Ensure “WebRTC” is routed via proxy. For “Canvas/WebGL”, enable the light noise iXBrowser suggests—unique enough without going overboard. Save the profile and relaunch it. Verify that site interfaces, local time, and system time match the IP region’s time zone. Key notes Consistency is everything. Language, time, geo, and IP provider should look coherent. Manual tweaks: if the profile feels “unnatural” (e.g., macOS with a rare font set and odd language), switch to iXBrowser’s recommended presets. Tip: Mimic a realistic user journey: visit local sites (regional news, maps) to accumulate relevant cookies. Expected result Your profile reflects the IP logic: sites see a correct time zone, language, geolocation, and device type. Possible issues and fixes Time mismatch: adjust the time zone manually and relaunch the profile. Pages switch languages: set two languages—regional first, English second—so sites adapt correctly. WebRTC still shows your IP: re-check “via proxy” mode and disable any extensions that alter WebRTC. ✅ Quick check: IP/time-check sites show the proxy location, local time matches the time zone, and the interface language aligns with your selection. Step 5: IP rotation and automation Goal Set up safe, predictable IP changes manually and/or automatically to reduce captchas and blocks without raising suspicion. Step-by-step Open the profile in ixBrowser and go to proxy settings. Find the field or section for “Change IP URL” (if supported by your iXBrowser version). Paste the rotation URL from your mobileproxy.space dashboard. Save the profile. Check that ixBrowser can call this URL (the request is usually made from your system). If there’s no direct URL integration, create a bookmark in the browser with the rotation link or set up a hotkey that calls the URL via an external script/utility. Alternatively, open your system browser and visit the link when needed. Define rotation rules: trigger manually before sensitive steps, or set periodic auto-rotation (if your proxy and workflow support it). Run a test: call the rotation URL, wait 5–15 seconds (sometimes up to 30), then refresh ‘what is my ip’ and confirm the IP changed. Document the wait time after rotation—that’s your operational guideline (e.g., “wait 15 seconds after pressing”). Key notes Don’t over-rotate. Frequent IP changes on a single site can look suspicious. One rhythm: set a simple rule for when to rotate (before login, after errors, ahead of bulk actions). Tip: If a site throws frequent captchas, rotate the IP and “warm up”: spend 2–3 minutes casually browsing related pages before key actions. Expected result You can change IP on demand or automatically according to your plan—and you can verify the change. Possible issues and fixes IP doesn’t change: confirm the correct URL, wait long enough, and check you haven’t hit your rotation limit. Logged out after rotation: some sites bind sessions to IP. Rotate before login or at safe moments.